Kaiser
Description
Event Involvements
Events with structured involvement data
Kaiser is invoked as the source of polling data Amy uses to press the political case on the gag rule, serving as a rhetorical instrument to justify riskier political moves during the crisis.
Referenced indirectly as poll data cited by staff in strategy discussion.
Influences staff argumentation but does not have direct operational power in the event.
Polling data pressures staff to weigh moral posture against practical consequences, affecting strategic choices.
Not directly engaged; functions as an external input into staff debate.
Kaiser is invoked as the pollster whose data Amy cites (62% support) to bolster the moral case against the gag rule; the organization functions as the empirical backbone to public-opinion arguments used in internal persuasion.
Through cited poll numbers invoked by staff to justify policy positions and to provide political cover.
Exerts soft power by shaping perceived public mandate; not directly procedural but influential in persuasion and political calculus.
Poll data functions as rhetorical ammunition during moral-legal tradeoff decisions and can legitimize policy positions.
Neutral data-provider; its influence depends on how staff invoke and interpret the numbers.