United Nations
International Refugee Law and Multilateral DiplomacyDescription
Event Involvements
Events with structured involvement data
The U.S. Delegation to the United Nations is listed in Jordan's résumé, underscoring her government-facing international-legal experience and making her a plausible advisor for transnational legal exposure arising from the Shareef killing.
Appears via Jordan's past roles cited from her credentials.
Represents state-level diplomatic legal apparatus that interfaces with international law; lends institutional credibility to Jordan's suitability.
Signals that international legal norms and diplomatic implications are relevant to the White House's calculus.
The U.S. Delegation to the United Nations figures in Jordan's résumé as prior employer; its citation reinforces her experience with international law and multilateral institutions relevant to assessing the legality of cross-border covert action.
Referenced through Jordan's past role and career milestones listed on the credentials screen.
Provides institutional legitimacy and procedural knowledge, but in this scene exerts influence only through Jordan's expertise.
Signals that the administration seeks counsel grounded in multilateral legal norms, complicating purely bilateral or deniable narratives.
Shut out via C.J.'s flat denial of ambassador's Konanov meeting, channeling multilateral diplomacy away from high-stakes engagement to protect U.S. strategic narrative on arms control and regional fires.
Through sidelined ambassador.
Excluded from core discussions.
Underscores U.S. unilateral control over flashpoints.
U.N. refugee conditions are invoked alongside U.S. law by Josh during briefing, reinforcing Chinese embassy stance that non-oppressed Christians fail international standards; Bartlet navigates this multilateral framework en route to unilateral shibboleth innovation.
Via cited criteria in diplomatic arguments
Global arbiter constraining unilateral asylum decisions
Forces reckoning of sovereignty versus global refugee norms
U.N. refugee conditions are cited by Josh alongside U.S. law, reinforcing Chinese embassy claims that non-persecuted individuals lack status—escalating the evidentiary burden that Bartlet sidesteps with his shibboleth ploy during this decisive Oval exchange.
Invoked as international benchmark in diplomatic recap
Imposing supranational standards that limit unilateral U.S. asylum flexibility
Complicates domestic mercy with multilateral refugee law constraints