Attorney General's List of Designated Hate Groups

Federal Legal Designation, Public Policy, and Domestic Extremism Accountability

Description

A federally compiled register maintained by the Attorney General's office that enumerates organizations formally identified as hate groups for investigative, prosecutorial, and public-policy purposes. Toby weaponizes it in heated bullpen clash, proposing public disclosure of both membership rolls and contributor lists for every group named—escalating policy debate amid staff fractures over ethics and midterm strategy. It stands as authoritative source defining disclosure targets, shaping threat assessments, and serving as bureaucratic lever in political and law-enforcement arenas, with no depicted internal hierarchy or operations beyond designation power.

Event Involvements

Events with structured involvement data

2 events

S2E3 · The Midterms

Toby's Disclosure Gambit Ignites Constitutional Firestorm

Toby explicitly bases his Step 3 policy on the Attorney General's List of Designated Hate Groups, proposing mandatory disclosure of all memberships and funding to empower public scrutiny and threat exposure post-assassination attempt.

Active Representation

Referenced as core authoritative source for policy targeting

Power Dynamics

Leveraged by Toby as bureaucratic tool against threats, unchallenged in debate

Institutional Impact

Highlights tension between security lists and civil liberties in crisis governance

Organizational Goals

Designate and expose hate entities for public safety Support prosecutorial and policy actions via listings

Influence Mechanisms

Official designation enabling disclosures Federal authority shaping investigations

S2E3 · The Midterms

C.J. Exposes Jordan's Jury Scandal, Shattering Sam's Idealism

Toby explicitly proposes public disclosure of membership and contributor rolls for all groups on the Attorney General's List of Designated Hate Groups as Step 3, positioning it as a transparency tool to expose funders and affiliates amid post-shooting urgency, fueling the core debate.

Active Representation

Referenced as authoritative source in Toby's policy blueprint

Power Dynamics

Weaponized by Toby as prosecutorial lever against threats, challenged by Sam's constitutional pushback

Institutional Impact

Highlights tensions between security imperatives and civil liberties in federal oversight

Organizational Goals

Facilitate public scrutiny of hate networks Enable threat assessments via membership data

Influence Mechanisms

Official designations guiding disclosures Bureaucratic authority in policy pitches