Door-to-Door Head Count (Traditional Census Enumeration method)

A procedural enumeration method invoked as a concrete policy artifact rather than a visible prop: imagined field enumerators, clipboards, and paper forms moving door to door to record residents. In the communications office it materializes as contested technical knowledge—Toby punctuates the argument by demanding Article I, Section 2; C.J. admits she's been 'faking it' on the census; Sam offers to tutor her at lunch—so the head count functions here as a teachable mechanism and a point of political leverage rather than a physical object onstage.

2 appearances

Purpose

To enumerate the resident population by sending enumerators from household to household to record who lives at each address for the official population count.

Significance

Serves as the immediate policy fulcrum: it anchors Toby's constitutional urgency, exposes gaps in the communications team's expertise, and becomes a rhetorical and pedagogical tool—turning technical enumeration details into political ammunition and character revelation.

Appearances in the Narrative

When this object appears and how it's used

2 moments

S1E6 · Mr. Willis of Ohio

Admitting Ignorance: C.J. Asks Sam to Teach the Census

The Door-to-Door Head Count is invoked by Sam as the central procedural artifact: he describes hiring enumerators, the method of going door-to-door, the scale and cost, and how the method systematically misses certain populations. It functions narratively as the concrete mechanism that anchors moral and tactical arguments.

Before: Referenced abstractly in briefing materials and the team's larger debate; not yet internalized by C.J.

After: Named, quantified, and integrated into C.J.'s understanding as a teachable mechanism she can now use rhetorically.

View full event

S1E6 · Mr. Willis of Ohio

Sam's Census Primer: Reframing the Count

The door-to-door head count is invoked as the central technical object of the lesson: Sam describes how it is staffed, funded, and executed, then points out its practical inaccuracy and bias. It functions narratively as the problem that sampling seeks to solve.

Before: Implicitly accepted as the standard method of the decennial census, described in briefing materials that failed to make its consequences clear to C.J.

After: Reframed in C.J.'s and Sam's minds as a flawed, costly mechanism that systematically undercounts vulnerable groups and therefore as a target for rhetorical and policy challenge.

View full event