Leo and Jordan's Snotty Aside and Disclosure Ultimatum
Plot Beats
The narrative micro-steps within this event
Leo and Jordan subtly mock Erickson's snotty demeanor, revealing their private alliance and Leo's attempt to deflect with humor.
Jordan presses Leo for full disclosure, refusing to entertain his dinner deflection, exposing her professional rigor and his evasiveness.
Who Was There
Characters present in this moment
Suppressed annoyance at partisan posturing
Seated among committee members, sighs visibly and restrains annoyance during Erickson's questioning and the witnesses' whispered aside.
- • Maintain professional composure amid hearing dynamics
- • Observe for opportunities to steer inquiry productively
- • Partisan sniping hinders substantive truth-seeking
- • Balanced probing yields better political outcomes
Smug confidence in partisan advantage
Clasps hands smugly, initiates interrogation on Article II succession, VP selection, and implies heightened mortality risk for Bartlet due to MS, prompting the witnesses' aside before Leo responds.
- • Pressure Leo into admissions on executive health secrecy
- • Undermine Bartlet's leadership via constitutional framing
- • Bartlet's MS disclosure failures justify aggressive scrutiny
- • VP selection process was tainted by withheld health info
Annoyed frustration masking deeper concern for Leo's evasiveness
Turns her microphone away, leans into Leo's whisper confirming Erickson's snotty tone, then annoyedly demands full candor for her $650/hour fee or threatens to quit, enforcing professional boundaries amid the hearing.
- • Extract full honesty from Leo to prepare effective testimony
- • Uphold her professional value and threaten withdrawal if unmet
- • Truthfulness is essential for her advisory role in crisis
- • Leo's partial disclosures risk catastrophic exposure
Amused defiance laced with vulnerability under pressure
Places hand over his microphone, turns to Jordan for hushed whispers mocking Erickson's snotty demeanor, flirts with dinner suggestion to deflect her probing, then removes hand from mic to lean in and affirm familiarity with Article II emphatically before defending Bartlet.
- • Diffuse tension with Jordan through humor and flirtation
- • Reassert control in testimony by correcting Erickson's implications
- • Loyalty to Bartlet demands fierce defense of his choices
- • Personal secrets must be selectively guarded even from allies
Objects Involved
Significant items in this scene
Serves as a privacy shield for Leo and Jordan's conspiratorial whispers mocking Erickson and debating candor, enabling intimate exchange amid public scrutiny; Leo removes his hand to resume amplified testimony, shifting from private deflection to public defiance, heightening dramatic tension between personal rapport and political exposure.
Location Details
Places and their significance in this event
Hosts the charged congressional hearing where Erickson's smug probe triggers Leo and Jordan's microphone-muffled aside for levity and friction, contrasting public partisan hostility with private alliance; daylight through windows illuminates the witness table, amplifying the intimacy of whispers against formal scrutiny.
Organizations Involved
Institutional presence and influence
Conducts the hearing through Erickson's smug constitutional probing on succession and Bartlet's VP pick amid MS nondisclosure, framing Leo's defiant response and aside with Jordan; underscores partisan leverage in investigating executive health secrecy.
Narrative Connections
How this event relates to others in the story
"Erickson's challenge about succession parallels Hoynes' reaction to Bartlet's MS revelation, both questioning the implications of Bartlet's health."
"Erickson's challenge about succession parallels Hoynes' reaction to Bartlet's MS revelation, both questioning the implications of Bartlet's health."
Key Dialogue
"LEO: "We're gonna have to do this again.""
"JORDAN: "He's being snotty?" LEO: "Yeah.""
"JORDAN: "Listen to me. I don't like this. You pay me six hundred and fifty dollars an hour. You tell me everything." LEO: "Well, what do I have to pay to only tell you some things?" JORDAN: "I don't know. But you have to pay it to another lawyer.""