Charlie Fights to Preserve the 'Game Tie'
Plot Beats
The narrative micro-steps within this event
Charlie grabs Donna's arm and pulls her aside to share critical information about the President's lucky tie.
Charlie explains the superstition behind the President's lucky tie, revealing its history and current dilemma.
Charlie shows Donna a replica tie, debating whether to use it as a replacement for the damaged lucky tie.
Donna challenges the superstition, suggesting the President's debate performance isn't tied to the lucky tie.
Charlie reaffirms the importance of the lucky tie, emphasizing its role as the 'game tie'.
Who Was There
Characters present in this moment
Openly worried and slightly panicked—fear that an inauthentic replacement will jinx the President, driven by loyalty and an obsessive need to preserve ritual.
Charlie intercepts Donna in the hallway, physically grabs her arm and pulls her into a corner, recounts the tie-burning anecdote, produces and holds up a near-replica tie, and argues, anxious and insistent, against substituting the talisman.
- • Prevent staff from substituting or discarding the 'game tie'.
- • Preserve the psychological comfort/ritual that he believes contributed to the President's past success.
- • Convince Donna (and by extension staff) that this is important and must not be tampered with.
- • Ritual objects can carry luck or psychological advantage that materially affects performance.
- • Tampering with a talisman (even by replacing with a replica) will reverse or destroy its effect.
- • Protecting small, meaningful rituals helps steady the President and the team under stress.
Dismissive but steady—exasperated with ritualized anxiety, focused on cutting through superstition to keep attention on real preparation.
Donna is grabbed and pulled into the corner, asks clarifying questions, listens with mild impatience, then calmly rejects Charlie's argument, uses the 'stoop cat' metaphor, and reframes the discussion toward competence over superstition.
- • Neutralize an anxiety-driven ritual that distracts staff and President.
- • Recenter team morale on competence and preparation rather than talismans.
- • Prevent escalation of superstition that could undermine rational debate prep.
- • Performance is determined by skill and preparation, not by objects.
- • Rituals that relieve anxiety can become crutches that harm more than help.
- • Confronting and discarding unfounded superstitions is healthier for the team long-term.
Objects Involved
Significant items in this scene
Charlie holds up a near-replica of President Bartlet's 'game tie'—a physical focal point of the dispute. The tie functions narratively as a talisman, a container of superstition, and the immediate trigger for the argument about luck versus preparation.
Location Details
Places and their significance in this event
The Alley is referenced as the origin of the inciting anecdote—where the President supposedly set his tie on fire while smoking. Though not the scene's physical setting, the Alley carries narrative weight as the birthplace of the 'game tie' myth and frames the ritual's authenticity.
The Stoop is invoked metaphorically by Donna as the place to 'throw out' the notion of the tie's power and test it—she imagines discarding the superstition to see if it is validated by chance (the cat), making the stoop a rhetorical device for discarding irrational belief.
Narrative Connections
How this event relates to others in the story
No narrative connections mapped yet
This event is currently isolated in the narrative graph
Key Dialogue
"CHARLIE: Okay. As I understand it, it was the last debate of the first campaign... Moments before the debate started, the President went out to the alley to sneak a cigarette, only he lit his necktie on fire. And Josh gave him his, and he won and now it's his game tie. And it got ripped at the cleaners by a cleaning solvent we probably shouldn't use anymore."
"CHARLIE: No, you've got to face the music and dance alone. Now it becomes the bad luck tie. Bad things will happen in that tie."
"DONNA: You know what? I think maybe you and the President are obsessing on the tie... I think the President's performance in the debate had actually very little to do with the tie."