Leo's Ultimatum: Mastico, Disinformation, and No More Games
Plot Beats
The narrative micro-steps within this event
Nissir suggests Bartlet is avoiding admitting Israeli complicity for electoral reasons, provoking Leo to mock the idea and issue a direct ultimatum regarding the Mastico and disinformation campaign.
Leo exits after delivering his demands, leaving Nissir to remark on his intensity, which Jordan sarcastically dismisses before exiting herself.
Who Was There
Characters present in this moment
Anxious and practical—worried the situation will escalate into catastrophic military consequences if not contained.
Jordan interjects repeatedly, pulling Leo aside into the Outer Oval Office to plead for de-escalation. She warns that continuing on this path will lead to war and urges turning the boat around, invoking Mallory and the President as human levers.
- • Prevent military escalation and avert war.
- • Convince Leo to choose a less confrontational, de-escalatory route.
- • Protect the President and political stability during the election.
- • Escalation could spiral beyond control and must be avoided.
- • Personal appeals (family, succession, the President) can temper Leo's instincts.
- • Legal/diplomatic restraint preserves broader strategic interests.
Invoked as a contentious figure whose alleged ties to terrorism justify U.S. action.
Abdul ibn Shareef is referenced as the Sultan's brother and a financier of Bahji; his status as deceased and implicated intensifies the diplomatic dispute though he is not present.
- • (Referenced) Serve as evidence linking Qumari elites to terrorist financing.
- • Function narratively to justify the U.S. airstrike.
- • His financing of militants implicates the royal family in terrorism.
- • His death and the surrounding claims will shape diplomatic consequences.
Referenced as a catalyzing loss that intensifies anger and demand for accountability.
Ben Yosef is invoked by Leo as a recent ally whose assassination fuels Leo's moral outrage; he is not physically present but his death is central to Leo's emotional justification for a hardline stance.
- • (As referenced) Serve as moral justification for U.S. response.
- • Remind interlocutors of the human cost of inaction.
- • The assassination of allies demands a robust response.
- • Moral clarity about culpability is necessary to honor the dead.
Referenced to humanize and personalize the risk of escalation for Leo.
Mallory is invoked by Jordan as a personal stake to reach Leo (do this for Mallory); she is not present but functions as an emotional lever in the conversation.
- • (As referenced) Temper Leo's instinct toward punitive action.
- • Provide a family-based rationale for de-escalation.
- • Invoking family can shift decision-making.
- • Personal consequences matter in policy deliberation.
Focused and engaged on domestic debate topics—unaware of the full intensity of the Mural Room confrontation unfolding off-camera.
President Bartlet is present only via a live television debate seen by Leo and Jordan; his domestic rhetoric provides ironic counterpoint and underscores the political stakes of Leo's diplomatic posture.
- • Win the debate and advance his education policy narrative.
- • Maintain public confidence and secure votes across key constituencies.
- • Clear, forceful rhetoric is persuasive in domestic politics.
- • The Administration must maintain a strong public policy message regardless of foreign complications.
Formally outraged but strategically composed—using righteous anger to press a political advantage while testing U.S. resolve.
Ambassador Ali Nissir stands as Qumar's spokesman in the Mural Room, accusing the U.S. and Israel of an illegal strike and asserting Qumar's narrative. He speaks indignantly, pressing the political angle that the President will not admit culpability during an election.
- • Force U.S. admission or international acknowledgment of Israeli culpability.
- • Protect Qumar's regime narrative and forestall domestic blowback at home.
- • Use diplomatic pressure to avert punitive actions against Qumar.
- • Framing the incident as Israeli culpability will gain Qumar diplomatic leverage.
- • The U.S. administration is politically vulnerable and may avoid confrontation during an election.
- • International audiences can be persuaded by a strong, moral denunciation.
Invoked to justify retaliatory measures and underscore the cost of terrorism.
The Israeli Foreign Minister is referenced as the victim shot down by Bahji operatives; his death functions as the proximate cause for the air strike and a moral anchor for Leo's fury.
- • (Referenced) Provide justification for U.S. and Israeli action.
- • Anchor the narrative of legitimate counterterrorism.
- • His death legitimizes strikes on Bahji infrastructure.
- • His loss increases the political and moral pressure on the Administration.
Righteously indignant with grief and weary resolve—anger focused into an uncompromising directive rather than equivocation.
Leo explodes with righteous fury: he rebuts Nissir point-by-point, names Bahji and Qumari madrassahs and royal financiers, invokes Ben Yosef's death and his own soldier past, issues a blunt ultimatum to turn the Mastico around and stop disinformation, then exits theatrically.
- • Compel Qumar to stop the flow of weapons by forcing the Mastico to reverse course.
- • Shut down the disinformation campaign linking Shareef's death to Israel.
- • Protect U.S. and Israeli security interests and personal integrity/honor.
- • Allowing diplomatic gamesmanship risks real war and dishonors dead allies.
- • Forceful, public pressure is necessary to stop covert support for terrorism.
- • Personal moral clarity is preferable to political caution in the face of terror financing.
Objects Involved
Significant items in this scene
The Qumari cargo ship Mastico functions as the scene's geopolitical fulcrum: Leo uses it as leverage, demanding it be turned around to prevent delivery of 72 tons of weapons to Bahji. Its course is the immediate, tangible action Leo seeks to change to avert further violence.
The TV in the room transmits President Bartlet's debate, creating dramatic irony and underscoring the political timetable. The debate's domestic focus contrasts and heightens the stakes of Leo's foreign policy ultimatum.
Nissir's phone is the implied instrument by which he can execute Leo's demand—calling to order the Mastico turned around and to cease the disinformation campaign. Leo explicitly tells Nissir to 'Make your phone call. I'll be waiting,' making the device the narrative means of compliance.
Location Details
Places and their significance in this event
The Mural Room is the formal negotiation chamber where the confrontation occurs. Murals and institutional history frame a space both ceremonial and combustible; it becomes a battleground of words where domestic politics and foreign policy collide.
Organizations Involved
Institutional presence and influence
Israel is invoked as the accused perpetrator of the strike; it functions as the proximate actor whose alleged actions catalyze the dispute, though it is not physically represented in the room.
The Sultanate of Qumar is represented through Ambassador Nissir and the disinformation narrative; Qumar's state apparatus is the target of Leo's ultimatum to reverse an arms shipment and stop blaming Israel, making the state actor central to the dispute.
Bahji is the covert antagonist whose operatives shot down the Israeli Foreign Minister and whose camps were targeted by the air strike; their existence justifies U.S. and allied actions and animates Leo's anger.
The United States government is represented by Leo and, indirectly, by the President on TV. The U.S. is asserting diplomatic and military leverage to stop arms flows and counter disinformation while balancing electoral politics.
The United Kingdom appears as an allied partner cited by Leo for joint search-and-rescue operations, lending credibility to U.S. claims and demonstrating allied cooperation in the incident's aftermath.
The Qumari Royal Family is implicated by Leo as financially supporting Bahji operatives; their mention links state elites to terrorism and escalates moral culpability for which Leo demands accountability.
Narrative Connections
How this event relates to others in the story
No narrative connections mapped yet
This event is currently isolated in the narrative graph
Key Dialogue
"NISSIR: I understand Western politics, and I understand President Bartlet is unable to admit Israel's complicity in the death of the Sultan's brother during a close election. So perhaps we could..."
"LEO: To sweep all fifty states, the President would only need to do two things-- blow the Sultan's brains out in Times Square, then walk across the street to Nathan's and buy a hot dog."
"LEO: Mr. Ambassador, you are going to turn the Mastico around. You are going to cease and desist any disinformation campaign that links the death of Shareef to Israel. And sometime next year, the Sultan is going to propose a Middle East peace plan -- the Qumar plan -- and win the Nobel Peace Prize. Make your phone call. I'll be waiting."