When Words Fail, Data Volunteers Himself
Plot Beats
The narrative micro-steps within this event
Data establishes communication with the nanites, revealing their evolving learning capability.
Picard requests a cease-fire with the nanites, but they refuse twice, showcasing their distrust.
Troi senses the nanites' lack of trust, linking it to Stubbs' earlier actions in the core.
Worf critiques the translator's limitations, sparking Data's idea for direct interface.
Who Was There
Characters present in this moment
Resolute but worried: command focus tempered by the moral and tactical implications of the nanites' refusals.
Picard directs the diplomatic effort, orders Data to request a cease‑fire, evaluates the replies with visible concern, summons Doctor Stubbs when trust issues are raised, and judges the limits of conventional contact.
- • Secure the safety of the ship and success of the experiment.
- • Use negotiation first to avoid lethal or destructive measures.
- • Identify the cause of the nanites' hostility and a path to de‑escalation.
- • Dialogue and measured diplomacy should be attempted before force.
- • The recent computer core incident has damaged trust and must be accounted for.
- • Bringing the responsible scientist into the conversation could clarify culpability and restore some context.
Focused curiosity with a dawning urgency — outwardly calm, internally alert and starting to feel the ethical weight of an improvised course of action.
At Science One Data composes and sends symbolic messages, reads evolving replies on the display, reports the repeated refusals aloud, and quietly begins to formulate an unorthodox, self‑sacrificial solution.
- • Establish a working channel of communication with the nanites.
- • Protect the ship and crew by negotiating a cease‑fire.
- • Find an alternative method to bridge the communicative gap after conventional attempts fail.
- • Direct, precise information exchange can alter emergent machine behavior.
- • Conventional translators and human negotiation may be insufficient for a new nonhuman intelligence.
- • He can serve as a better interface between machine and human modes of understanding.
Distrustful and impatient — he doubts technological intermediaries and favors straightforward confrontation.
Worf challenges the reliability of the universal translator and vocalizes a preference for direct, face‑to‑face combat or negotiation, signaling distrust of mediated contact in this high‑stakes situation.
- • Question the efficacy of current communication tools.
- • Advocate for more tangible or forceful means of engagement if necessary.
- • Protect the ship by preventing misplaced faith in imperfect systems.
- • Technological mediation (like translators) can conceal real intent and are not always reliable.
- • Direct confrontation provides clearer truth and control.
- • Emergent threats should be met with strength if diplomacy appears futile.
Decisive and professional — engaged in executing orders and ensuring necessary personnel arrive quickly.
Riker immediately obeys Picard's order and exits the bridge to personally bring Doctor Stubbs, showing decisive operational follow‑through while keeping the chain of command intact.
- • Fetch Doctor Stubbs to provide technical or ethical context to negotiations.
- • Maintain command cohesion by executing Picard's directives promptly.
- • Senior officers should respond personally to critical summons.
- • Bringing the scientist responsible for the experiment will aid understanding or accountability.
Concerned and cautious — she reads collective emotional residue and warns command about its impact on negotiations.
Troi offers an empathic assessment: she senses diminished trust across the emergent intelligence tied to the computer core incident, and communicates this assessment to Picard and the bridge team.
- • Clarify the emotional barriers preventing successful communication.
- • Advise command on restraint and humane responses.
- • Prevent escalation by highlighting the psychological dimensions of the crisis.
- • Emotional memory (trauma) within the system affects present behavior.
- • Understanding affective states can guide strategy more effectively than pure technical fixes.
- • Restorative approaches have a chance if trust can be addressed.
Objects Involved
Significant items in this scene
The main bridge viewscreen displays Data's symbolic transmissions and the nanites' short responding symbols, making the otherwise abstract exchange visible to the senior staff and anchoring the negotiation in shared, observable data.
The universal translator is invoked rhetorically by Worf as a present but limited tool; its known constraints are used to argue that conventional translation cannot bridge this emergent intelligence's understanding.
The Science One keyboard is the tactile interface Data uses to compose and send symbolic messages to the nanites. It functions as the immediate bridge for attempted linguistic exchange and is where Data's iterative experiments with communication are performed.
Location Details
Places and their significance in this event
Science One (the aft science station on the main bridge) is the physical locus where Data operates, where symbolic messaging is composed, and where command watches replies. It acts as both technical mouthpiece and ethical fulcrum for attempting contact.
The computer core is invoked as historical context: a recent incident there has eroded the emergent intelligence's trust. It functions narratively as the source of culpability and trauma shaping current negotiations.
Narrative Connections
How this event relates to others in the story
No narrative connections mapped yet
This event is currently isolated in the narrative graph
Themes This Exemplifies
Thematic resonance and meaning
Part of Larger Arcs
Key Dialogue
"PICARD: Ask them for a cease-fire... put it in whatever words you think they'll understand."
"DATA: ((surprised)) Captain, their answer is... no."
"TROI: I sense that after the incident in the computer core, there is very little trust..."