Narrative Web

Who Owns the Doctrine?

In Toby's office Will reads a values-driven foreign policy—language drawn from a struck Bartlet speech—and a charged argument erupts over authorship, authority, and consequences. Toby reacts like a guardian of process, deriding the proposal as "Mother Theresa with first-strike capabilities" and warning that two speechwriters can't unilaterally invent doctrine. Will counters by tying the language to the unfolding Khundu massacre, exposing moral urgency and implying political hypocrisy if credit were different. The scene ends with Toby dismissing Elsie and reasserting control of his domain, a defensive consolidation that frames the policy fight as personal as well as procedural.

Plot Beats

The narrative micro-steps within this event

3

Toby accuses Will of attempting to craft foreign policy unilaterally, comparing the doctrine to "Mother Theresa with first-strike capabilities."

frustration to defiance

Will exits but returns to argue Bartlet would endorse radical ideas if Toby wrote them, leading to a tense exchange about loyalty and consequence.

defiance to resignation

Toby dismisses Elsie after the confrontation, reasserting control over his office.

tension to dismissal

Who Was There

Characters present in this moment

8
Josh Lyman
primary

Not present but referenced as part of the advisory set whose buy-in would be required for doctrine change.

Josh is referenced alongside Leo as a senior counselor; his inclusion underscores the team-based nature of presidential advice and the procedural objection Toby raises to Will's unilateral drafting.

Goals in this moment
  • To influence the President's policy through counsel (implied).
  • To manage political fallout from any doctrinal shift (implied).
Active beliefs
  • Doctrine should be the product of senior staff consensus.
  • Policy change has political and bureaucratic consequences that require coordination.
Character traits
strategic operative (as counselor)
Follow Josh Lyman's journey

Referenced as the steady conveyor of facts; emotionally neutral in this scene but instrumental in framing urgency.

C.J. is mentioned indirectly — her press briefing earlier set the Khundu body count at 15,000 — and her reporting provides the factual hook that Will uses to press moral urgency.

Goals in this moment
  • To communicate the human toll of Khundu to the public via the press briefing.
  • To ensure accurate casualty figures inform internal policy debates.
Active beliefs
  • Transparency in reporting matters for both public awareness and policy urgency.
  • Numbers and briefings can drive political and moral pressure.
Character traits
reliable authoritative (as press source)
Follow Claudia Jean …'s journey
Stacy
primary

Professional and unobtrusive; her contribution is functional rather than emotional.

Stacy is referenced as the courier who dropped off the draft pages that Will reads; her action catalyzes the scene though she is not onstage during the argument.

Goals in this moment
  • To deliver requested material promptly to speechwriters.
  • To ensure relevant documents reach the appropriate staff for urgent drafting.
Active beliefs
  • Accurate, timely information is necessary for effective speechwriting.
  • Administrative work can shape high-level debates by choice of what gets circulated.
Character traits
efficient precise supportive
Follow Stacy's journey

Defensive and disdainful on the surface; anxious about institutional risk and guarding rhetorical authority.

Toby intercepts Will's reading with skepticism, identifies the language as old Bartlet text struck for reason, critiques the notion of two speechwriters inventing doctrine, mocks idealism with the 'Mother Theresa with first-strike capabilities' line and dismisses Elsie at the end to reclaim his office.

Goals in this moment
  • To prevent ad hoc rhetoric from being elevated into official doctrine without interagency coordination.
  • To maintain control over the President's voice and keep speechcraft within established processes.
Active beliefs
  • Foreign policy must be crafted with interagency input, not invented by two speechwriters.
  • Grand moral rhetoric divorced from operational planning is dangerous and hypocritical.
Character traits
protective of process cynical sharp-tongued territorial
Follow Toby Ziegler's journey

Not present but represented as a moral authority whose past words carry political weight and consequences.

President Bartlet is quoted indirectly as the source of the struck language; his historical wording is the disputed material that both anchors and complicates the proposed doctrine.

Goals in this moment
  • To have a presidential voice that can articulate national values (implied).
  • To reconcile moral rhetoric with practical constraints (implied historical judgment).
Active beliefs
  • The President has expressed universalist values that staff now debate implementing.
  • Past rhetorical choices may be struck from record for practical or political reasons.
Character traits
moralistic (as quoted) authoritative (as rhetorical source)
Follow Josiah Bartlet's journey

Absent but implicated as a moderating institutional force whose interests are being appealed to.

Leo is invoked by Will as one of the President's senior counselors; his name functions as shorthand for the internal advisory network that would vet doctrine, raising the stakes of unilateral speech decisions.

Goals in this moment
  • To be involved in high-level decisions about doctrine (implied).
  • To balance idealism with political and institutional realities (implied).
Active beliefs
  • Senior counselors should shape doctrine collectively.
  • Institutional checks are necessary for responsible policy.
Character traits
influential trusted (as advisor)
Follow Leo McGarry's journey

Amused and mildly conspiratorial; she provides levity while privately sympathetic to Will's urgency.

Elsie sits in the room, interjects with a sardonic historical quip about U.S. behavior ('Somebody called our father'), watches the sparring, stays behind after Will leaves and accepts Toby's curt dismissal with mild amusement.

Goals in this moment
  • To support Will informally and observe the framing of the President's voice.
  • To defuse tension with humor and remain an available ally to staffers.
Active beliefs
  • History shows the U.S. will act when it chooses; invoking past behavior undercuts naive idealism.
  • Personal relationships (First Lady's favor) permit her to be present in policy spaces in a light, meddling way.
Character traits
witty irreverent observant unflappable
Follow Elsie Snuffin's journey

Not applicable — used as rhetorical contrast to highlight perceived danger when moralism is paired with militarism.

Mother Teresa is invoked metaphorically by Toby as the foil for the proposed doctrine; she is not present but her moral authority is weaponized rhetorically to expose a perceived contradiction.

Goals in this moment
  • To serve as a moral benchmark against which Toby measures the draft (rhetorical function).
  • To make the audience see the absurdity of combining pure altruism with first-strike power.
Active beliefs
  • Pure humanitarianism is not a policy toolkit when mixed with offensive force (as implied by Toby's simile).
  • Invoking revered figures clarifies the moral stakes of rhetoric.
Character traits
sacrificial moral exemplar (invoked)
Follow Mother Teresa's journey

Objects Involved

Significant items in this scene

2
Bartlet's 16-Year-Old Red Mass Speech Draft

Pages from Bartlet's 16-year-old Red Mass speech are the historical source embedded in the disputed draft; Toby recognizes the phrasing as previously stricken, using that provenance to discredit resurrecting it now.

Before: Archived/stricken from official record historically; incorporated into the …
After: Re-surfaced in the current argument; its prior removal …
Before: Archived/stricken from official record historically; incorporated into the dropped-off draft that Will reads.
After: Re-surfaced in the current argument; its prior removal is reasserted as reason to avoid reinstating the language.
Stacy's Disputed Foreign Policy Speech Draft

Stacy's disputed foreign policy speech draft provides the pages Will reads aloud; it functions as both catalyst and evidence, containing struck Presidential language and prompting the authorship and process dispute between Will and Toby.

Before: In transit — recently delivered by Stacy and …
After: Remains in the room as the contested text; …
Before: In transit — recently delivered by Stacy and in Will's possession for reading and review.
After: Remains in the room as the contested text; read aloud and discussed, its content now known to Toby and Elsie and implicated in the staff debate.

Location Details

Places and their significance in this event

2
Republic of Equatorial Kuhndu

The Republic of Equatorial Khundu is the humanitarian crisis that Will invokes to convert abstract rhetoric into urgent moral action; Khundu's casualty figures frame the debate and supply the emotional imperative behind the draft language.

Atmosphere Haunting and urgent as a referenced site of suffering that presses on the room's moral …
Function Moral catalyst and narrative pressure point that justifies proposed doctrinal clarity and action.
Symbolism Represents distant human cost that tests the administration's rhetorical commitments and political will.
Referenced casualty figures (15,000) as cold fact that drives urgency Imagined images of mass suffering invoked through speech text
El Salvador

El Salvador is invoked by Toby as historical precedent for the struck language; it functions as a concrete example of when high-minded rhetoric was judged politically or operationally unwise and subsequently removed from the record.

Atmosphere Used as a cautionary historical echo—distant but weighty, carrying institutional memory.
Function Historical reference point that grounds Toby's procedural argument against resurrecting old doctrine.
Symbolism Symbolizes past mistakes and the prudence of striking certain rhetoric from official record.
Past speech provenance invoked aloud Sense of archival history influencing present speechcraft

Organizations Involved

Institutional presence and influence

3
National Security Council

The National Security Council is cited as part of the institutional web that should oversee any doctrinal invention; Toby names the NSC to stress that national security policy is collective, not the product of speechwriters alone.

Representation Referenced as the coordinating body that would need to be engaged for responsible policy formulation.
Power Dynamics Positioned as a central coordinating authority that must balance State, Pentagon, and White House political …
Impact Its invocation highlights governance norms that constrain rhetorical excess and signal the bureaucratic complexity of …
Internal Dynamics Implied internal deliberation and the necessity of chain-of-command review before doctrine changes.
To adjudicate interagency trade-offs before new doctrine is promulgated. To prevent unilateral creation of policy that could trigger strategic or operational consequences. Interagency meetings and National Security protocols Policy vetting and approval processes
Pentagon

The Pentagon is referenced as the military authority that would be affected by any doctrine prescribing force; Toby's argument points to the Pentagon as a necessary stakeholder whose operational concerns make unilateral rhetorical claims risky.

Representation Invoked as the institutional actor responsible for force and casualty estimations, a practical counterweight to …
Power Dynamics Exercising practical authority over use-of-force considerations; depicted as a necessary partner that constrains rhetorical ambitions.
Impact Its mention emphasizes the gap between rhetoric and implementation and highlights interagency friction over doctrine …
Internal Dynamics Implied caution and resistance to doctrine that presumes ready military action without policy and legal …
To protect military readiness and prevent politically-driven operational commitments. To ensure any doctrine is viable given military capability and legal constraints. Operational assessments and casualty estimates Chain-of-command and practical feasibility arguments
State Department

The State Department is invoked as the traditional steward of diplomatic policy and careful speech language; Toby lists it among the institutions that should vet any doctrinal shift, positioning the Department as a necessary check on ad hoc rhetoric.

Representation Mentioned abstractly as the institutional actor that would normally shape doctrine and speech language.
Power Dynamics Portrayed as an authoritative but procedural body that exerts moderating influence over presidential language and …
Impact Its invocation underscores bureaucratic constraints on rhetorical invention and reflects tensions between moral rhetoric and …
Internal Dynamics Implied need for consultation and hierarchical vetting before elevating rhetoric to doctrine.
To ensure diplomatic language is precise and does not create unintended obligations. To manage interagency consensus before major doctrinal shifts are announced. Technical policy wording and diplomatic precedent Institutional credibility and the need for interagency coordination

Narrative Connections

How this event relates to others in the story

What led here 4
Thematic Parallel medium

"Bartlet's dissatisfaction with State Department's conservative language parallels Will's proposal of a bold new doctrine based on American values."

Prompter Politics and the Missing Washington Bible
S4E14 · Inauguration Part I
Thematic Parallel medium

"Bartlet's dissatisfaction with State Department's conservative language parallels Will's proposal of a bold new doctrine based on American values."

Demanding a Doctrine
S4E14 · Inauguration Part I
Thematic Parallel medium

"Bartlet's dissatisfaction with State Department's conservative language parallels Will's proposal of a bold new doctrine based on American values."

Courtly Verse and Quiet Alarm
S4E14 · Inauguration Part I
Thematic Parallel medium

"Bartlet's dissatisfaction with State Department's conservative language parallels Will's proposal of a bold new doctrine based on American values."

Khundu Briefing — Humanitarian Crisis Interrupts Doctrine
S4E14 · Inauguration Part I
What this causes 4
Character Continuity

"Will's reading of the old Bartlet speech directly influences Bartlet's reflection on the moral dilemma of valuing Khundunese lives."

Banter, Then Bare Truth
S4E14 · Inauguration Part I
Character Continuity

"Will's reading of the old Bartlet speech directly influences Bartlet's reflection on the moral dilemma of valuing Khundunese lives."

The Moral Question in Will's Draft
S4E14 · Inauguration Part I
Character Continuity

"Will's reading of the old Bartlet speech directly influences Bartlet's reflection on the moral dilemma of valuing Khundunese lives."

Ballsy Admission and the Question of Lineage
S4E14 · Inauguration Part I
Character Continuity

"Will's reading of the old Bartlet speech directly influences Bartlet's reflection on the moral dilemma of valuing Khundunese lives."

Abrupt Exit — Doctrine Questioned, Answers Deferred
S4E14 · Inauguration Part I

Key Dialogue

"WILL: "We are for freedom of speech everywhere. Freedom to worship everywhere. Freedom to learn for every child.""
"TOBY: "This language proposes a new doctrine for the use of force. That we use force whenever we see an injustice we want to correct. Like Mother Theresa with first-strike capabilities.""
"WILL: "C.J. this morning put the body count at 15,000.""